Hi, thanks for the great tool!
I noticed a possible inconsistency in how particle_diameter is interpreted in the code:
In command_line.py L33
particle_diameter seems to be treated as a pixel-based radius.
But in RELION’s original code (e.g. ml_optimiser.cpp L642)
particle_diameter is defined as an Ångström-based diameter.
In command_line.py L185
it again appears to be used as an Ångström diameter, consistent with RELION.
This makes me wonder:
Is the unit/meaning of particle_diameter intended to differ here, or is this a small oversight?
Just raising the question in case this was unintentional. Thanks!
Hi, thanks for the great tool!
I noticed a possible inconsistency in how
particle_diameteris interpreted in the code:In
command_line.pyL33particle_diameter seems to be treated as a pixel-based radius.
But in RELION’s original code (e.g.
ml_optimiser.cppL642)particle_diameter is defined as an Ångström-based diameter.
In
command_line.pyL185it again appears to be used as an Ångström diameter, consistent with RELION.
This makes me wonder:
Is the unit/meaning of particle_diameter intended to differ here, or is this a small oversight?
Just raising the question in case this was unintentional. Thanks!