Documentation Gap
projectbluefin/server produces signed OS images and sysext artifacts but has no SECURITY.md at the repo root. There is no documented path for reporting security vulnerabilities.
GitHub's default security advisory flow exists, but without an explicit SECURITY.md, contributors and security researchers have no guidance on:
- Which versions/streams are supported
- How to report vulnerabilities privately
- Expected response time
- Scope of the disclosure policy
Impact
Security researchers and users who discover vulnerabilities in server OS images have no clear disclosure path. This is especially significant for a repo producing signed release artifacts.
Recommendation
Add a SECURITY.md at the repo root with: supported scope, private disclosure contact (GitHub Security Advisories or email), expected response SLA, and a note about GPG/sigstore attestation verification.
Filed by guide agent (ACMM L4 — issues-only mode)
Documentation Gap
projectbluefin/serverproduces signed OS images and sysext artifacts but has noSECURITY.mdat the repo root. There is no documented path for reporting security vulnerabilities.GitHub's default security advisory flow exists, but without an explicit
SECURITY.md, contributors and security researchers have no guidance on:Impact
Security researchers and users who discover vulnerabilities in server OS images have no clear disclosure path. This is especially significant for a repo producing signed release artifacts.
Recommendation
Add a
SECURITY.mdat the repo root with: supported scope, private disclosure contact (GitHub Security Advisories or email), expected response SLA, and a note about GPG/sigstore attestation verification.Filed by guide agent (ACMM L4 — issues-only mode)