feat: add content filter to MCP - #247
Open
Pringled wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Confidence Score: 5/5The PR appears safe to merge. No blocking failure remains. Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "refactor: build MCP content indexes lazi..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a
contentargument to MCP, just like the CLI, resolving #246. Searches still default to code. When docs, config, or all is explicitly requested, the MCP lazily builds an index containing exactly that content and caches it separately for reuse. This avoids making the default indexing path slower or unexpectedly indexing large non-code files.