Skip to content

[19.0] [MIG] product_pricelist_by_contact : Migration to 19.0 - #2349

Open
kalpeshgajera-uncannycs wants to merge 8 commits into
OCA:19.0from
kalpeshgajera-uncannycs:19.0-mig-product_pricelist_by_contact
Open

[19.0] [MIG] product_pricelist_by_contact : Migration to 19.0#2349
kalpeshgajera-uncannycs wants to merge 8 commits into
OCA:19.0from
kalpeshgajera-uncannycs:19.0-mig-product_pricelist_by_contact

Conversation

@kalpeshgajera-uncannycs

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[19.0] [MIG] product_pricelist_by_contact : Migration to 19.0

pedrobaeza and others added 8 commits July 27, 2026 15:48
This module allows to set a different pricelist per each contact, so that such
pricelist is used in the sales flow.

Usage
=====

* Go to *Contacts* (you need to install module `contacts` for having this menu entry).
* Select one contact that is not the parent one.
* On the tab "Sales & Purchases", you will be able to select a different pricelist
  from its parent contact.
* If you change the pricelist in the parent contact, the pricelist of the children
  contacts will be overwritten with this one, no matter the previous value.

Known issues / Roadmap
======================

* Not requiring to override any sales behavior is possible due to the way Odoo
  retrieves the pricelist directly associated to the contact, but no code is put
  here for assuring that such behavior is preserved across time.
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: product-attribute-18.0/product-attribute-18.0-product_pricelist_by_contact
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/product-attribute-18-0/product-attribute-18-0-product_pricelist_by_contact/
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added series:19.0 mod:product_pricelist_by_contact Module product_pricelist_by_contact labels Jul 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

mod:product_pricelist_by_contact Module product_pricelist_by_contact series:19.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants