Add PUMA: Semantic-Preserving Early Exit for Reasoning Models - #7
Open
ZhishanQ wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Add PUMA: Semantic-Preserving Early Exit for Reasoning Models#7ZhishanQ wants to merge 1 commit into
ZhishanQ wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding PUMA (arXiv 2026-05) to Efficient Reasoning during Inference → Length Budgeting at the top of the chronological list, alongside DEER ("Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models").
PUMA is a plug-and-play inference-time early-exit framework for Large Reasoning Models. Unlike answer-level early-exit methods (DEER uses confidence; others use trial-answer consistency), PUMA introduces reasoning-level semantic redundancy as a complementary stopping signal — detected by a lightweight Redundancy Detector (fine-tuned Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B with a contrastive objective) — followed by an Answer Verification window confirming the candidate exit.
Results across 5 LRMs (DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B/14B/32B, Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-8B, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking) and 5 reasoning benchmarks (MATH-500, AIME24, AIME25, OlympiadBench, GPQA-Diamond): 26.2% average token reduction with preserved (slightly improved) accuracy; 1.40× / 1.28× wall-clock speedup on DS-7B/14B. Also generalizes to LiveCodeBench (code) and zero-shot VLM reasoning (MathVista, MathVision).
Thanks!