Skip to content

datamodel-code-generator vulnerable to arbitrary local file read via XSD `schemaLocation` (`xs:include`/`xs:import`) path traversal, with no remote-ref gate

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 12, 2026 in koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator • Updated Jul 28, 2026

Package

pip datamodel-code-generator (pip)

Affected versions

>= 0.59.0, <= 0.61.0

Patched versions

0.62.0

Description

Summary

When generating models from an XML Schema (--input-file-type xmlschema), datamodel-code-generator resolves <xs:include>, <xs:import>, <xs:redefine>, and <xs:override> schemaLocation attributes against the source directory and reads the target with no restriction to the input/base directory. An attacker who controls the input XSD can read arbitrary files via ../ traversal or an absolute path, and the included schema's contents (type names, restrictions, enumerations) are folded into the generated output. Unlike the JSON-Schema $ref path, there is no allow_remote_refs control for XSD, so --no-allow-remote-refs does not mitigate it. This is an unauthenticated path-traversal / information-disclosure issue reachable in the default configuration.

Details

The XSD parser walks include-style children and reads each schemaLocation with only an is_file() check (src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/xmlschema.py):

location = (source_dir / schema_location).resolve()   # .resolve() collapses ../, escapes base
if location in seen or not location.is_file():
    continue
included_root = self._parse_schema(_read_xml_text(location, self.encoding), location)

schema_location is attacker-controlled and _read_xml_text does path.read_bytes(). Because (source_dir / schema_location).resolve() normalizes .. and accepts absolute paths, the resolved target can be any file the process can read; there is no is_relative_to(base_path) containment (contrast the JSON-Schema HTTP-local branch, which does enforce it). The same unbounded read occurs both during version detection and during the main include-processing pass, so the included content is incorporated into the generated module.

Related vectors that were tested and do NOT apply (stdlib xml.etree.ElementTree is used): external-entity XXE file read does not occur (ElementTree does not fetch external entities), and entity-expansion "billion laughs" is rejected by CPython's expat amplification limit.

PoC

Self-contained reproducer (creates a temp dir, runs the generator, cleans up): https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/c7096b797926348875d888652867eeb4 (poc.py).

Minimal manual reproduction:

mkdir -p /tmp/x/secret /tmp/x/proj
cat > /tmp/x/secret/leak.xsd <<'EOF'
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <xs:simpleType name="LEAK_5150"><xs:restriction base="xs:string"/></xs:simpleType>
</xs:schema>
EOF
cat > /tmp/x/proj/attack.xsd <<'EOF'
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <xs:include schemaLocation="../../x/secret/leak.xsd"/>
  <xs:element name="Root" type="LEAK_5150"/>
</xs:schema>
EOF
datamodel-codegen --input /tmp/x/proj/attack.xsd --input-file-type xmlschema --no-allow-remote-refs --output /tmp/x/out.py
grep LEAK_5150 /tmp/x/out.py   # content from outside the project dir appears in generated code

An absolute schemaLocation="/abs/path/leak.xsd" works identically.

Impact

Arbitrary local file read / path traversal (CWE-22) leading to information disclosure (CWE-200). Any application, CI pipeline, or multi-tenant service that generates models from an attacker-supplied XSD and exposes (returns, logs, commits, renders) the generated code is affected. The attacker can read files outside the input tree whose data is addressable as XSD content (other schemas, configs), and the read itself is an arbitrary-file-access primitive. No flag mitigates it. The attacker controls only the input schema; no authentication or special privileges are required. (Raw bytes of files that are not valid XML are read into the process but not echoed verbatim, since parsing fails; verbatim disclosure applies to XML/XSD-shaped data.)

Suggested remediation

Reject resolved schemaLocation targets that are not resolved.is_relative_to(self.base_path), and bring XSD includes under the same remote/external-reference policy enforced for JSON-Schema $ref.

Maintainer status

Confirmed by maintainer review and regression tests. The private fix PR was merged and released in 0.62.0: https://github.com/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator-ghsa-442q-2j6p-642g/pull/1

Fix summary: reject XSD schemaLocation targets that resolve outside the input base path, including relative traversal and absolute paths.

Release status: fixed in 0.62.0. XML Schema input support was introduced in 0.59.0, so affected versions are >= 0.59.0, <= 0.61.0.

Validation: uv run --group test --extra http pytest tests/main/xmlschema/test_main_xmlschema.py passed locally; uv run --group fix ruff check src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/xmlschema.py tests/main/xmlschema/test_main_xmlschema.py passed.

Submitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 28, 2026
Reviewed Jul 28, 2026
Last updated Jul 28, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(29th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Learn more on MITRE.

Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere

The product uses an externally controlled name or reference that resolves to a resource that is outside of the intended control sphere. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-55390

GHSA ID

GHSA-442q-2j6p-642g

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.