-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
Abstract the public-facing API away from ClientResponse #13152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Moist-Cat
wants to merge
11
commits into
aio-libs:master
Choose a base branch
from
Moist-Cat:response-refactor
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+209
−155
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7f3661c
Abstract user-facing public API for ClientResponse
Moist-Cat 0dc257e
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] a2e1af5
Add missing branch
Moist-Cat c57315d
Fix style issues
Moist-Cat d7a96d7
Remove slots
Moist-Cat b8da07b
Remove mysterious import cycle
Moist-Cat 423b102
Merge branch 'aio-libs:master' into response-refactor
Moist-Cat 340d78b
Merge branch 'master' into response-refactor
Moist-Cat 42a9f4b
Fix types
Moist-Cat ce2e5b3
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 89e2294
Merge branch 'aio-libs:master' into response-refactor
Moist-Cat File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this is the HTTP/1 class, right?
I still think, atleast in master/v4, that we probably want to rename this and have the base class be called ClientResponse. That means that middlewares etc. which reference ClientResponse shouldn't need any changes to work in future with the HTTP/2 class.
With these current changes, we'd need to changes lots of references from ClientResponse -> BaseResponse, both in our code and in user's code.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This causes type errors as well because we are reducing the capabilities of the
ClientResponseclass. All the methods that use the response as a connector object viastart,read, etc, stop working. Though, reviewing the type errors, it seems that most come from the tests. I'm not sure if any users or middlewares use these methods.That said, I'm okay with switching the child class with the new parent class if you believe it's better for backwards compatibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, but that's the HTTP/1 specific methods, right? Any code that currently requires them is going to break regardless, as anything that currently receives ClientResponse, will in future need to handle receiving both HTTP1 and HTTP2 classes.
Code which doesn't depend on those methods will need no updates to annotations etc. if the base class reuses the existing ClientResponse name. So, yeah, I think it's a much easier migration for users if the parent is ClientResponse.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's true.
That makes sense to me.