Skip to content

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

10 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

AI Latency Budgeting & Reactive Scaling Framework

A Production Performance Reference by Vipin Kumar

© 2026 Vipin Kumar. All rights reserved.

Technical Focus: A production-grade blueprint for managing LLM inference latency budgets, establishing multi-tier scaling triggers, and implementing automated rollback logic based on p99 tail-latency behavior.


🚀 Overview

This repository presents a production-grade latency budgeting model and reactive scaling architecture for AI systems using p50, p95, and p99 latency signals.

It defines how to:

  • Break down latency across pipeline stages
  • Establish end-to-end SLOs
  • Handle tail latency (p99)
  • Trigger scaling and apply backpressure
  • Safely rollback under degradation
  • Optimize Infrastructure Costs: Prevent over-provisioning by using high-fidelity p99 signals to scale only when mathematically necessary.

📊 Latency Distribution (Concept)


🧠 Architecture Diagram


📊 Latency Model

Pipeline Stages

Stage p50 p95 p99
Embedding <100 ms <200 ms <400 ms
Retrieval <200 ms <400 ms <800 ms
LLM Inference <1000 ms <2000 ms <4000 ms

End-to-End Targets

  • Base p95: 2600 ms
  • With overhead: ~2800 ms
  • p99: ~5200 ms

⚡ Key Concepts

  • p95 ≈ 2× p50 → normal variance
  • p99 ≈ 2× p95 → tail amplification
  • LLM dominates (~70–80%) latency
  • Percentiles do not compose linearly

🔄 Reactive Scaling Strategy

Thresholds

Condition Action
p95 > 1800 ms Scale up workers
p95 > 2800 ms (2 min) Trim logging
p95 > 3000 ms (2 min) Load shedding

🛡️ Stability & Recovery

Backpressure

  • Rate limiting
  • Load shedding
  • Logging reduction

Rollback Logic

  • Error rate > 1%
  • OR p99 > 1.2× baseline (2–5 min sustained)

⚙️ Execution Model

  • Sequential:
    total = sum(stages) + overhead

  • Parallel:
    total = max(stage) + overhead


🧪 Environment Strategy

Stage Metric Focus
DEV p50
QA / SIT p95
UAT / STG p95 + p99
PRD p99

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • Design around p95 (SLO)
  • Monitor p99 (instability signal)
  • Scale before breach (≈90% threshold)
  • Optimize LLM first
  • Protect system with backpressure + rollback

📄 Full Document

Refer to the detailed document:

About

Production-grade AI latency budgeting and reactive scaling framework for LLM inference systems. Covers p50/p95/p99 modeling, SLO design, Kubernetes (K8s) HPA patterns, and distributed AI infrastructure. By Vipin Kumar

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Contributors