docs(sdd): evaluate NanoNets Graft — discard as third graph - #379
Merged
Conversation
Record type E comparison of Graft against GitNexus + Graphify. Discard as kit payload (frontal overlap + AGENTS.md wiring); defer freshness/statusline/SWE-bench patterns without the runtime. Co-authored-by: Pedro Vilarim <pvilarim@users.noreply.github.com>
pvilarim
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 18, 2026 00:45
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Type E explore of NanoNets/Graft (
@nanonets/graft@0.10.1) against the ByeByeVibe stack (OpenSpec + GitNexus + Graphify).Answer: Graft is a better-packaged map of the repo for coding agents. It is not a spec-driven framework and does not replace the kit. Its two graph tiers occupy both layers we already ship (GitNexus code graph + Graphify concept graph). Full
graft initalso writesAGENTS.md, an always-on Cursor rule, MCP, and Claude Code hooks — the same overlap criterion that discarded code-review-graph and TencentDB Agent Memory.Decision recorded: Discarded as kit payload / replacement. Deferred as a pattern source only (query-time freshness, staleness statusline, cold-vs-wired SWE-bench methodology).
What Graft uniquely has (UX, not missing capability)
Compatibility
Compatible only as CLI-only (
graft build/graft askwith--no-mcp --no-hooks --no-agents), which throws away the differentiators. Full init is incompatible with guide §2.5.1 and with a two-graph split of labor.Files
doc/avaliacoes/2026-08-17-nanonets-graft.md— full evaluationdoc/avaliacoes/README.md— index rowopenspec/project.md— non-goal (do not add a third codebase graph)Test plan
doc/avaliacoes/TEMPLATE.md