Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Email Finder API Comparison 2026 — 9 APIs, from a Developer's Point of View

A developer-focused comparison of 9 email finder APIs (Tomba, Hunter, Snov.io, GetProspect, Anymailfinder, Skrapp, VoilaNorbert, Prospeo, Findymail): base URLs, auth schemes, HTTP methods, endpoint coverage, official SDKs, and free tiers — every field linked to the vendor's own docs. Open CSV data + a zero-dependency Python script.

Powered by Tomba Data: open Python

Email finder API comparison 2026

Different from email-finder-comparison. That repo benchmarks accuracy (5,000 real searches, who returns the most valid emails). This repo compares the APIs as developer products — how you authenticate, what endpoints exist, which SDKs ship, and what you get for free. If you're choosing an email API to build on, start here; if you're choosing one for data quality, start there.

TL;DR

  • Auth is not standardized. Five different schemes across nine APIs: two static headers (Tomba), a single API key in a header or query param (Hunter), OAuth2 with a 1-hour token (Snov.io), HTTP Basic (VoilaNorbert), and a Bearer token (Findymail). Plan your client accordingly.
  • GET vs POST splits the field. Tomba and Hunter are GET-first (trivial to curl); Prospeo and Findymail are POST-only with JSON bodies.
  • Endpoint breadth varies widely. Tomba exposes the widest documented surface in this set (domain search, finder, verifier, enrichment, author finder, phone, bulk). Most others cover the core three (domain search / finder / verifier) plus bulk.
  • Everyone has a free tier, none needs a credit card to start.

Auth & request format

Tool Auth scheme Credential location HTTP methods
Tomba API key + secret X-Tomba-Key & X-Tomba-Secret headers GET
Hunter API key api_key query param / X-API-KEY / Bearer GET
Snov.io OAuth2 (client credentials) Authorization: Bearer <token> (expires 3600s) GET/POST
GetProspect API key API key header GET/POST
Anymailfinder API key Authorization: <key> header POST
Skrapp.io API key X-Access-Key header GET/POST
VoilaNorbert Basic auth API_TOKEN via HTTP Basic GET/POST
Prospeo API key X-KEY header POST (JSON only)
Findymail Bearer token Authorization: Bearer <key> POST

Endpoint coverage

Tool Domain search Email finder Verifier Enrichment Author Phone Bulk
Tomba
Hunter
Snov.io
GetProspect
Anymailfinder
Skrapp.io
VoilaNorbert
Prospeo
Findymail

A means "not documented among the sources cited below," not "definitely absent." Vendors ship and rename endpoints often; treat this as a starting map and confirm against the linked docs before you build. See sheets/sources.csv for every source URL.

Free tier & SDKs

Tool Free on signup Card required Official SDKs
Tomba 75 credits + 25 searches/mo + 50 verifications no 10 (PHP, Python, Go, Java, Ruby, JS, Laravel, Django, Rails, …)
Hunter free plan (limited searches/mo) no official (Python, Ruby, PHP, …)
Snov.io trial access on request no community
GetProspect 50 free emails no
Anymailfinder pay-per-valid (free if not found) no
Skrapp.io free plan no
VoilaNorbert 50 free verified emails no Node.js, PHP, Python, Ruby
Prospeo free credits no
Findymail free signup credits no

See it in code — Tomba in three calls

The examples/curl/ scripts call three Tomba endpoints and the committed *.output.json files are the real responses (captured 2026-06-04):

# 1) Domain search — every email behind a domain
curl -sG 'https://api.tomba.io/v1/domain-search' \
     --data-urlencode 'domain=stripe.com' --data-urlencode 'limit=5' \
     -H "X-Tomba-Key: $TOMBA_KEY" -H "X-Tomba-Secret: $TOMBA_SECRET"

# 2) Email finder — most likely address from a name + domain
curl -sG 'https://api.tomba.io/v1/email-finder' \
     --data-urlencode 'domain=stripe.com' \
     --data-urlencode 'first_name=Patrick' --data-urlencode 'last_name=Collison' \
     -H "X-Tomba-Key: $TOMBA_KEY" -H "X-Tomba-Secret: $TOMBA_SECRET"
# → {"data": {"email": "patrick@stripe.com", "score": 99, ...}}   (real captured result)

# 3) Email verifier — deliverability of one address
curl -sG 'https://api.tomba.io/v1/email-verifier/info@stripe.com' \
     -H "X-Tomba-Key: $TOMBA_KEY" -H "X-Tomba-Secret: $TOMBA_SECRET"

Get a free key (no card) at app.tomba.io/auth/register.

Print the comparison locally

No dependencies, no API key — the sheets/ CSVs are the source of truth:

python3 compare.py            # all four tables
python3 compare.py endpoints  # one table
pytest -q                     # 7 tests over the data + renderer

Data & methodology

  • Date: 2026-06-04. API surfaces change; re-verify before relying on a row.
  • Source of truth: the four CSVs in sheets/. Every claim traces to a vendor doc URL in sheets/sources.csv.
  • Scope: developer-facing facts (auth, methods, documented endpoints, free tier, SDKs). It does not measure accuracy or price-per-valid-email — that's email-finder-comparison.
  • Corrections welcome: open a PR editing the relevant CSV row + its source URL. The tables above are generated from those CSVs.

License

Code: MIT — see LICENSE. Data (the CSV sheets): free to reuse with attribution.

Related

About

A developer-focused comparison of 9 email finder APIs (Tomba, Hunter, Snov.io, GetProspect, Anymailfinder, Skrapp, VoilaNorbert, Prospeo, Findymail): base URLs, auth schemes, HTTP methods, endpoint coverage, official SDKs, and free tiers — every field linked to the vendor's own docs. Open CSV data + a zero-dependency Python script.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages